<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE wml PUBLIC "-//WAPFORUM//DTD WML 1.1//EN" "http://www.wapforum.org/DTD/wml_1.1.xml">
<wml>
<head><meta forua="true" http-equiv="Cache-Control" content="max-age=0" /></head>
<card title="Kt Kingtronics the chose of MLCC Capacitors" id="card1">
<p> Guest</p><p>
Topic:Kt Kingtronics the chose of MLCC Capacitors<br/>
Content:<br/>
For a 10uF capacitor we recommend using a 1206 footprint, and for 22uF and 47uF we recommend a 1210 footprint. The 1812 footprint is slightly better than the 1210 for the 47uF, but we don&amp;rsquo;t think the improvement is worth the extra space and added cost.Sometimes the product cost may also impact the chosen footprint. For example, if a 1210, 22uF capacitor is more than double the cost of a 1206, then the 1206 component may be preferred. In other applications, the designer may just want to get the maximum capacitance in a limited available footprint. If, for example, there is only room for a 1206 capacitor, the 47uF part will still have the most capacitance even if it loses a larger percentage of its value than the 22uF or the 10uF parts.<br/><a href="https://www.kingtronics.tw/wap.asp?mode=WAP&amp;act=View&amp;id=113&amp;Page=1">[&lt;&lt;]</a><a href="https://www.kingtronics.tw/wap.asp?mode=WAP&amp;act=View&amp;id=113&amp;Page=1">[[1]]</a><a href="https://www.kingtronics.tw/wap.asp?mode=WAP&amp;act=View&amp;id=113&amp;Page=1">[&gt;&gt;]</a><br/>
<br/>
<a href="wap.asp?act=Com&amp;id=113">Browse comment(0)</a><br/>
<a href="wap.asp?act=AddCom&amp;inpId=113">Post comment</a><br/><br/>

<br/>

<br/>
<a href="https://www.kingtronics.tw/wap.asp">First page</a>
</p>
</card>
</wml>